Islamic Movement of Nigeria: Ozekhome blasts Buhari govt for proscribing Shi’ite, tells him to ban Miyetti Allah

Mike Ozekhome, a constitutional legal representative and human rights activist, has actually faulted the Federal Government over the proscription of Islamic Movement of Nigeria, IMN, likewise called Shi’ite. Ozekhome explained the proscription as extremely inequitable and unconstitutional. The Federal Government had actually acquired a court order to proscribe the Shi’ites group.

An Abuja Federal High Court had on Friday ordered the proscription of IMN, following their clashes with security operatives. The Justice Nkeonye Maha-led court designated the activities of IMN organisation in any part of Nigeria “as acts of terrorism and illegality.” Recall that members of IMN had on Monday assaulted emergency situation point of the National Emergency Management Agency, NEMA.

However, the constitutional attorney compared the action to the case of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, which was proscribed by the federal government under doubtful circumstances. Speaking with New Telegraph, Ozekhome questioned why Federal government had refused to proscribe the Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association( MACBAN ), which had been connected to severe acts of horror and terror in the country.

He stated: “What group could be more terrorist than the herdsmen and their known anchor, Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association? This has held Nigeria down by the jugular for years, killing, maiming, burning, raping and turning Nigeria into a crimson field of blood. Until the government bans and outlaws these kind of groups, it is certainly not serious.

“The Shi’ite group is a religious group just like the President’s Sunni group. It is not an association that could be banned. They are demanding for the release of their leader still kept in government dungeon in spite of several court orders.

“Section 10 of the Nigerian Constitution makes Nigeria a secular state. You can’t ban religion, a people’s belief. There is also freedom of thought, conscience and religion in Section 38, while Sections 40 and 41 allow for freedom of movement and association. The Constitution is ruthlessly being shredded by an intolerant and overbearing civilian dictatorship.”

Written by Frank Udoh

Frank Udoh is a content creator and curator with many years of experience. He is also an article writer and blogger


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *





BBNaija 2019: Gidoni, Mercy risk eviction, strike after smashing Big Brother’s phone

What Police said about the abduction of Siasia’s mother