in

Biafra: How my bail revocation exposed Justice Binta Nyako as ignorant – Nnamdi Kanu claims

How my bail revocation exposed Justice Binta Nyako as ignorant – Nnamdi Kanu claims

an image of How%20my%20bail%20revocation%20exposed%20Justice%20Binta%20Nyako%20as%20ignorant%20%u2013%20Nnamdi%20Kanu%20claims How-my-bail-revocation-exposed-Justice-Binta-Nyako-as-ignorant-–-Nnamdi-Kanu-claims_1554200198034.jpg

How my bail revocation exposed Justice Binta Nyako as ignorant – Nnamdi Kanu claims: The leader of Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Nnamdi Kanu, has said on Tuesday that Justice Binta Nyako who revoked his bail, is ignorance of the Nigerian constitution.

Nnamdi Kanu cited section 36 sub-section 12 of the Nigerian constitution to backup his claim. IPOB leader said that secession was not written down as an offence in the nation’s constitution and hence he cannot be convicted. He claimed that section 36 sub-section 12 of the nation’s constitution forbids trial and conviction of anybody in a Nigerian court of any offence not written down in the constitution.

To get the full story of, How my bail revocation exposed Justice Binta Nyako as ignorant – Nnamdi Kanu claims, keep reading below;

Biafra: How my bail revocation exposed Justice Binta Nyako as ignorant – Nnamdi Kanu claims

The leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Nnamdi Kanu, on Tuesday, again lambasted Justice Binta Nyako of an Abuja Federal High court, following the revocation of his bail.

Kanu claimed that the trial judge was ignorant of the Nigerian constitution.

In a tweet, on Tuesday, the IPOB leader said the Nigerian constitution prohibits trial and conviction of anybody for “offence not written down.”

an image of How%20my%20bail%20revocation%20exposed%20Justice%20Binta%20Nyako%20as%20ignorant%20%u2013%20Nnamdi%20Kanu%20claims How-my-bail-revocation-exposed-Justice-Binta-Nyako-as-ignorant-–-Nnamdi-Kanu-claims_1554200329610.jpg

Citing Section 36 sub-section 12 of the Nigerian constitution, the IPOB leader maintained that secession was not written down as an offence in Nigeria, hence he can’t be convicted.

“Section 36 sub-section 12 of the Nigerian Constitution PROHIBITS trial and conviction of anybody in a Nigerian court of any offence not written down. Secession or self-determination is not written down as an offence in Nigeria. Binta Nyako is ignorant of the law,” he tweeted.

Justice Nyako, who had granted Kanu bail few years ago had last week revoked the bail.

The trial judge said that Kanu’s bail was revoked due to his refusal to attend his trial since he was granted bail.

http://dailypost.ng/2019/04/02/biafra-bail-revocation-exposed-justice-binta-nyako-ignorant-nnamdi-kanu-claims/

What can you say about Nnamdi Kanu citing a section of Nigerian constitution to back his claim that Justice Binta is ignorant of the constitution which she has sworn to protect as a judge?

Please help share this article, How my bail revocation exposed Justice Binta Nyako as ignorant – Nnamdi Kanu claims, with your friends.

| Share with your friends! |

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading…

0

Comments

0 comments

What I told Buhari about Saraki’s replacement – Okorocha reveals

Senate Presidency: What I told Buhari about Saraki’s replacement – Okorocha reveals

Left-Handed People Are Truly Exceptional, According to Science